Generally the responses were quite good. Students raised some interesting points when analyzing the work of Bill Henson. Some responses; however, lacked depth and appeared rather rushed. As the year progresses, students terminology should improve, and subsequently, so should your responses. Furthermore, when giving your opinion (in your conclusion), avoid using I.
Finally, read over your responses- a number of submissions contained inappropriate terms and grammatical errors.
Responses were marked informally – (H)High, (M)Medium and (L)Low. Those that obtained a low need to work to improve in the next analysis.
Subscribe to these posts
If you wish to get updates on a continual basis - subscribe to this site!