Written Analysis Notes

Generally the responses were quite good. Students raised some interesting points when analyzing the work of Bill Henson. Some responses; however, lacked depth and appeared rather rushed. As the year progresses, students terminology should improve, and subsequently, so should your responses. Furthermore, when giving your opinion (in your conclusion), avoid using I.
Finally, read over your responses- a number of submissions contained inappropriate terms and grammatical errors.
Responses were marked informally – (H)High, (M)Medium and (L)Low. Those that obtained a low need to work to improve in the next analysis.

Categories: Photography


Teacher of Visual Arts

Subscribe to these posts

If you wish to get updates on a continual basis - subscribe to this site!

No comments yet.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: